| Munich
January 6th, 2006
Rabbi Gary S. Creditor
Richmond, Virginia
Munich
is a name, is a place, which resonates in Jewish consciousness
before and separately from the fall of 1972. Jews first came to
that city in the early 1200's and lived through cycles of expulsions,
pogroms, readmittance and renewed persecutions that continued in
the 1800's. Jews in Munich never knew extended peace and quiet;
certainly not security. The community grew in the 19th and 20th
centuries until its destruction by the Nazis in the Holocaust.
The first concentration camp, Dachau, was opened just outside the
city. For reasons that I will never understand, Jews kept coming
back to Munich, including the 1972 Olympics. Surely, they must
have thought, we all thought, that Jews wouldn't be murdered any
more in the city of Munich, in the country of Germany. How wrong
that thought was.
I remember that time explicitly and vividly. Ruby and I were married
in June 1972 and those High Holy Days would be the first time that
I officiated for an adult congregation, having previously led services
for teenagers. I was both looking forward to and terrified of that
opportunity. I led services, davened, blew shofar and read Torah.
The murder of the Israeli athletes at Munich paralyzed me. I was
left speechless. Fortunately the chazzan, a much older and wonderful
gentleman, born in Europe, spoke before Yizkor. I can't remember
what he said.
Wiser because of years, and more experienced, especially by living
in Israel for nearly two and a half years of my life, having studied
and immersed myself in Zionism, having watched Spielberg's movie "Munich" last
night, I can simply say, it's not one of his best. It is fundamentally
flawed. It has lines that beg for context and his simplistic treatment
allows people, Jews and gentiles, to deduce ideas and thoughts
that are erroneous. It is influenced by a pronounced anti-Zionist
personality, Tony Kushner. The writers never consulted the living
participants or the surviving families. The characters are caricatures.
It is disappointing, upsetting, disgusting, much too long, and
not worth the price of admission. If I didn't need to make this
sermon, I wouldn't have given him my $8.50. What can we say? What
should we say?
What happened at Munich, 1972 was murder. Murderers
are not heroes. Murderers should be punished. Yet the Games went
on and the surviving murderers were ultimately set free. The
world moved on. Jewish blood watered the German earth, again.
This movie is very misleading. The struggle between Arabs and
Israelis or better put, between Moslems and Jews didn't begin
in Munich. This wasn't a tit for tat scenario. The struggle began
in a virtually empty Turkish province, its forests denuded, its
water infested with malaria-infested mosquitoes, absentee landowners,
and a very small indigenous Arab population along with a small
aged Jewish community, mostly in Jerusalem and Tzfat. To this
ignored and devastated piece of real estate, the only people
to proclaim sovereignty in its area, returned - key and operative
word - returned Jews who had learned a difficult and most painful
lesson long before the Holocaust - the world, at least the European
world, was not hospitable to Jews. Legally obtaining land, purchasing
it for cold, hard cash, these Jews, the BILU and other early
Zionists, renewed - again a key and operative word - renewed
Jewish settlement on the land, where when you dig, you find Jews,
Jewish things, and Jewish names. Originally, the Jews were welcomed
home - another key word, by the Turks and Arabs. This was not
to last. From then on Jewish existence would be bought by blood.
Books are sanitized records that don't show you the blood and
guts by which the Jewish people reclaimed, resettled and repopulated
their - our homeland, all the while attempting to live in peaceful
coexistence with the growing Arab population. Ultimately, autonomous
Jewish existence, on whatever tiny and inconspicuous area, was,
and to some Moslems/Arabs, remains an anathema. That must be
extinguished and expunged. He should have named the movie, The
Munich Murders, for Munich was just one point in a continuing
never-ceasing-saga of the murder of Jews, of Israelis. A truism
from the movie - an Israeli is never a civilian. As long as they
have served in the army, when they are out of uniform, they are
still fair game to be killed. There is no battlefield where the
war ends. One side can be defeated but not vanquished, so the
fight continues. That is true. The movie corrupts the historical
record.
-
Fighting for your existence is dirty. Therefore
Israel and Israelis deserve our highest respect and admiration.
That does not translate into justifying everything that Israel
or Israelis do. But you and I don't have to lift a finger
except maybe to write a check. Our lives are not on any battlefield.
Our children dream of computers, Ipods, and not learning
how to shoot an M-16, fly and jet fighter, or hand to hand
combat, or the really dirty stuff of stopping those who would
kill you. The episodes after Munich that the movie tries
to portray and does so most badly, were not for revenge as
much as they were counter-terrorism, so intercept and interdict
those who would perpetrate such actions upon Jews/Israelis
in Europe. This is not Gene Autry and Roy Rogers. This is
blood and gore. This is killing so you will not be killed.
The only rule in all of this is that there are no rules.
The old maxim is true, this much: All is fair in love - I
don't know about that - and war. This is war! It is still
war! How do think they have stopped buses being blown up
in Jerusalem? How do think they stopped hotels being blown
up on Seder night? How do think they stopped they from taking
children hostage and murdering them, as they did in Ma'alot,
a village you don't even remember? Not by saying "Pretty
please." And not by offering anything and everything. The
movie shows the dirtiness, but it doesn't show that Israel has
cried "stop" and was answered by the three "no's" of
Khartoum, no recognition, no negotiations and no peace. Why didn't
he put that in, to show the hopelessness and helplessness of
Israel's predicament? Why doesn't he allude to uselessness of
the United Nations that since 1948 has done nothing to secure
Israel's existence and would it be massacred along with all the
other massacres that it has done nothing to prevent or stop?
Silence. This movie says nothing. For Tony Kushner the creation
of the State of Israel was a mistake. And everything that follows
from the mistake is fruit tainted by the "original sin." Thus
everything that happens to Israelis/Jews is justified.
-
Fighting dehumanizes you. But
it doesn't remove the justice of the mission. Spielberg
and Kushner did not interview real Mossad operatives
or their families because they didn't want the truth,
which would not have made for a good movie thriller.
They didn't question their mission. They didn't show
the angst. They didn't regret their deeds. They regretted
that this is the world into which they were born and
into which they will bring their children. When I hold
our grandson and play with our granddaughter and then
read the newspapers I have many twinges inside of me.
Oh for such a world. Yet mothers in Israel send their
sons and daughters to the army and all branches of service.
Fathers see their children in uniform and look at themselves
in the mirror. Is there a choice? If the opposite side refuses
to say "peace" and mean it, not like Arafat,
even when offered 97% and Jerusalem? And when the other side
- the Palestinians say Gaza now and Jaffa next, as if Tel
Aviv doesn't exist, nor the past 57 years? Kushner doesn't
care. That is why Avner, not true to life, remains in New
York. For Kushner the twin towers are still standing in the
last scene. That is a lie. Terrorists destroyed them and
murdered their occupants. The same would be the fate of Israel.
Kushner doesn't get it. For him, Israelis are Jews who should
leave or get what they deserve, or become pitiless animals.
He has ignored the historical record and Spielberg with him
did not make a documentary. They used it as a pretext for
a bad, gory thriller, which should be panned and ignored,
and certainly rebuked.
-
In many ways there is no separation between Jew and
Israeli. We think there is. Israelis think there
is. So why does the media call me when Robertson makes
statements about Sharon? Do Catholics have to answer for
Italy? Israelis are just Jews living in Israel. Jews are
Israelis living elsewhere. That is how the world sees us.
Maybe they are right. If the Jewish people are really one,
and that is not a Federation slogan to get us to give more
money, then we should pay attention to each other, care
for each other and know each other. Maybe the real problem
is not enough Jews are going to get really mad about this
film and say something or do something. Why do we call
Israel a "homeland?" What does it mean
to you? I know what it means to me. Is it just a tear-jerking
tourist stop, or a place to which each Jew should make
a religious pilgrimage? Why is it so difficult to get Jews
to come with me to Israel, when there is no intifada? And
if there is no connection, then why should we care about
this movie at all? I won't permit you the fantasy that
there is a real middle ground. There isn't.
-
In Psalm 149, verse six,
we read: "…and
a double-edged sword in their hand; to execute vengeance -
n'kama - upon the nations, chastisements upon the peoples…" All
the late medieval Jewish commentators cloak these words
in apologetics. They couldn't even imagine a Jew fighting;
never mind in a tank and jet plane. They sugar coat these
words to mean religion, prayers, and beliefs. They did
this because they really knew the plain meaning of the
words: there comes a time when you have to defend yourself,
to kill or be killed, to strike back lest timidity encourages
further attacks, when silence indicates weakness and vulnerability.
Inaction indicates the victim ready to be victimized. What's
wrong with vengeance sometime? Why should our blood be
less red than someone else's? Why should the murderers
and butchers be right and the blood of the murdered and
the butchered be spilled with impunity? The Rabbis said
that at times, even if God be silent and we expect or with
hubris demand His action and it does not, then it is "At La'asot" - "A time to do." Spielberg
doesn't get it. Kushner couldn't care less. What it says
is says in an undignified manner. He also omits that every
prayer service ends with a prayer for peace, not vengeance.
Every Hamas pronouncement ends with a call for our eradication.
They cheered with Sadaam Hussein's missiles hit Israel,
a non-combatant in the Gulf War, and little fuss is made
when the Iranian president calls for Israel's destruction
and denies the Holocaust. Spielberg and Kushner don't get
it. Because of the uneducated or myopic general public,
Jew and non-Jew alike, this movie is not only bad. It is
dangerous.
Don't see the movie if you haven't
already.
Second thought, go see the movie, too bad for the wasted money, and get mad.
Third thought, see the movie, get mad, learn more and speak knowledgeably to
others.
Last thought, see the movie, get mad, learn a lot, speak to others, and come
with me to Israel.
Now. This summer. Prove the connection between Jew and Israel.
Show Israelis that Jews love them. Show the world that we love Israel.
By action and not lip-service.
Shabbat Shalom. |