Moses, Johnny Carson, and Dan
Rather: Character Studies in Contrasts
June 23, 2006
Tomorrow morning's Torah portion of Shelach Lecha
is one of the most dramatic portions in the Bible. It's begins
with great hopes and expectations and plunges to unimaginable depths.
Having arrived in the wilderness of Paran, a hop, skip and a jump
from Eretz Yisrael, Moses sends out twelve princes of the tribes
to reconnoiter the land. He expected them to come back quickly
and with a positive report. The reverse! It takes them forty days!
And when they return, ten of them, while praising the land, say
that they will never make it! This sets off The Great Rebellion.
As a result, the adult generation is sentenced to die in the wilderness
and never reach the Promised Land, except for Caleb and Joshua.
They were the only two who remained faithful and tried to rally
the people, who, if unchecked, were ready to reverse course and
return to Egypt. This is the scene in its essence. Only God's appearance
halts the catastrophe.
There are several protagonists to this scene:
The ten spies who say they can't make it.
The two spies who say they can.
God.
The Israelites.
Aaron, who has little input.
And Moses.
The Torah does not provide detailed psychological insights and information.
In its brevity - just imagine how heavy the scroll would be if it did! -
it gives only the slightest of sketches and leaves the rest to us. So I
wonder:
Why didn't Moses get up and scream at them!
Why did he abdicate center-stage to the younger men, one who will be his
successor?
Why did this man who met God face to face, the faithful prophet - choke?
How was he feeling at this critical moment, crossroads and crisis?
His mission was to bring them home.
He stood up to Pharaoh in the palace.
He stood up to Pharaoh's army at Yam Suf.
How was he feeling when confronting his own rebellious people?
We will never know.
One last question: Why didn't he quit? Pack it in, retire, then and there?
Why didn't he?
The more I read Torah, the more times I repeat the same parasha, the more
questions I have, and the fewer answers. The Torah leaves us with a fact:
Moses will struggle on with the Israelites for the next forty years. He will
give them his life, his sweat, blood and privately, his tears. Except for
one moment, he will never publicly show his disappointment or dismay. Moses,
from this sedra, is a paradigm, a model, of leadership, of commitment, of
unswerving devotion to a higher cause, and offers his life on its altar.
Only in the Midrashical Rabbinical imagination, does Moses argue with God,
on the eve of their entrance into Eretz Yisrael, to let him continue in his
mission. And God says, "No." "Here
and now is the end."
These thoughts on Shelach Lecha were instigated by events this week at
CBS. I grew up looking at the "all Seeing Eye" of its logo, and the voice
of Walter Cronkite was nearly the voice of God. If he said it, it was true!
He not only narrated the news, but he also narrated the show, "You Were
There" whose sponsor was the Prudential Life Insurance Company. Their
logo was the Rock of Gibraltar. His face and assured voice reinforced by "The
Rock" indicated that whatever he said was true! And then he retired
to be replaced by Dan Rather. Most of us are of a vintage to remember him as
the young reporter in Viet Nam, while Walter Cronkite sat the main news desk.
He exits CBS as Katie Couric enters the front door. I am struck by the somewhat
symmetry of subject between the sedra and the current scene. Douglas Durden's
headline caught my eye: "There's a whiff of tragedy around exit of Rather." We
could echo the late Lloyd Benson's comment of Dan Quail in the debate - "You're
no John Kennedy" - and say about Rather - "He was no Walter Cronkite." Yet
he served approximately forty years, at times risked life and limb for CBS
to report the news, and made only one serious mistake, just like Moses, namely,
the story of President Bush and the National Guard. The feature articles by
Howard Kurtz and of the Washington Post besides Durden’s indicate that
perhaps Rather should have exited more gracefully earlier, not going from news
anchor to 60 Minutes. Thus a stellar career - from Yugoslavia to Iraq, conventions
and hurricanes, interviews with Bill Clinton and Saddam Hussein, ends in such
an ignoble way. The article indicates that lately he has seen the movie "Good
Night and Good Luck" five times, sometimes by himself. While no wise indicating
any comparability of Moses and Dan Rather, God forbid, this does provide us
with striking contrasts in parallel conditions and two different paradigms.
I want to present a third paradigm.
I virtually never go to sleep before the eleven thirty time slot
because I grew up to the voice of Ed McMahon announcing "Heeere's Johnny." Johnny
Carson hosted the Tonight Show for thirty years. (If he did it for forty the
parallelism would be a tad better.) Through good and bad I didn't miss too
many shows. In May 1992 he retired. In the New York Times of May 23rd, 1992
Bernard Weinraub wrote an article entitled "Johnny Carson Fades Out, His
Dignity and Privacy Intact." Not that his departure did not have its
attendant difficulties. It certainly did. But he sites several quotations
that offer us another paradigm for this juncture in life that we will all
face some day in our individual ways. I have saved this article for fourteen
years, just to use tonight.
"Perched on a stool before an audience of network executives and the families
of the show's staff and crew he said: "I'd like to do the whole thing all
over again. It's been a great experience in my life." At the show's finale,
Mr. Carson spoke quietly. "And so it has come down to this," he said. "You
people watching - it has been an honor and a privilege coming into your homes
and entertaining you." And then, moment later, his voice broke as he said; "I
bid you a very heartfelt goodnight." Talking in the parking lotto an NBC
news crew he said: "Everything comes to an end; nothing lasts forever.
Thirty years is enough. It's time to get out while you're still working on
top of your game, while you're still working well."
As we all know, Johnny Carson never returned to the Tonight Show, remaining
out of the limelight until his death. His choice to end his career when,
where and how offers another contrasting paradigm to that of Dan Rather
and to Moses.
One of my favorite shows was JAG. On one of the episodes Ernest Borgnine
was a guest. In one of those throwaway lines he enunciated a pearl: "Old heroes
never die. They just become the stuff of legends." These are three legends,
each different, each illuminating. Each presenting us with paradigms for
life.
Shabbat Shalom.
|